TODAY’S THOUGHTS ☠️
Hey friend 👋,
Something a little different today.
While I never bought into the “AI jobpocalypse” pushed by the mainstream media, I am very aware of the structural change happening in the entry-level of the workforce.
The next generation workforce is facing competition with AI to do the roles they would normally occupy to learn the expertise to eventually succeed me and you.
This is creating a problem.
Graduate schemes, apprenticeships and entry level roles are being reduced across many fields (except manual labour). While many companies believe AI is a cheaper and better option, we’re building several problems with a potential lost generation and a lack of a future talent pipeline.
This is not an AI problem.
It is in how we’re choosing to use and deploy AI.
So, today, we’re exploring if we’ve doomed the next-generation workforce.
Get your tea or beverage of choice ready 🍵.
We've got lots to discuss!
P.S. Your app might clip this edition due to size. If so, read the full edition in all its glory in your browser.

IN THIS DROP 📔
How can the next generation build expertise without entry level roles?
A human operating system for surviving and thriving with AI
How (and why) you should use AI to teach AI

🙋♀️ Want to reach over 5,000 L&D pros? Become a Newsletter sponsor in 2026
THE BIG THOUGHT 👀
Have We Doomed the Next-Generation Workforce?

The kids are not alright.
I can’t shake an insight I saw from a report out of the Digital Education Council in partnership with Google from the states:
“AI Increases the Value of Expertise While Making It Harder to Build: Professionals with deep domain expertise are best placed to judge where AI should be applied. Yet pathways for building that expertise are narrowing as AI absorbs entry-level work.”
That translates to "if you’re old enough, wise enough and gathered the experience required to know what good looks like, then you’ll do well with AI”, but what if you don’t have that?
What if you’re under 25 and looking at a job market which is saying “We don’t want you because AI can do the simple tasks you can do”. That is a scary place to be for a young person. While I don’t believe the statement of “AI can do the task to the same standard” to be completely accurate (I mean, just look at the token costs right now for the most basic of tasks), I also can’t deny it can do a lot of low-level tasks very well.

Source: Digital Education Council
We all started out at the bottom in an entry level role
I was 19 years old when I first walked through the doors of the fallen tech giant of Xerox in 2007.
I didn’t know much about anything. I had some academic education but had little to nothing on the education of life.
This first corporate job taught me a lot, mostly indirectly.
It wasn’t a course I took. It was everyday moments where I watched events, listened to people and read tons of documents that taught me some of the fundamentals of thinking, behaving, communicating and generally ‘how to get shit done’ at work.
There is still no degree that can teach you that.
Those 3 years with Xerox prepared me for the next level of the business world when I joined one of the world’s leading grocery retailers that operated across a global scale and employed 350,000 people. Xerox is where I learned the fundamentals, but my 6 years with Tesco group is where I got my business education.
Both of these experiences have shaped the capabilities I have today.
Not the technical ones, the human ones.
But AI wasn’t around in my time. I didn’t have to compete against a tool that never sleeps, never asks questions and isn’t looking to further its career. This is the reality young people face right now.
We know that those who do well with AI are those who have the experience to identify what good work is and render the judgement to spot when things aren’t going well. Yet, that pipeline is not going to last forever.
I’m about to turn 40. I’m in the sweet spot of “having the expertise” and “knowing how to leverage AI”, but I’m not going to be around forever. Others will need to take my place, and the only way to do that is if we invest in the youth of today so they can build the level of expertise I (and probably you) possess today.
I hope it’s obvious to see the perils of ignoring the next generation workforce in favour of AI doing all the low-level work.
But if not…let me spell it out for you.
The talent pipeline will break, the unemployment rate will get much worse and we will have generations unable to develop the core human skills to navigate life and support the global economy at large.
Yes, I’m doing my best Orwellian and Nostradamus infused impression here, yet I’m genuinely worried.
In my homeland of the UK, the numbers of youth unemployment craft a grim picture:
In January to March 2026, there were 729,000 young people aged 16 to 24 who were unemployed. That’s 110,000 more than the previous year with a youth unemployment rate of 16.2%, up from 14.2% the year before.
That 16.2% overall rate is the highest since 2015 and actually exceeds the pandemic peak of 15.2% recorded in September 2020. For those not in full-time education, youth unemployment has risen to 14.7%, which means one in seven young people seeking work, the highest rate in more than a decade.
This, of course, is not all because of AI.
There are many micro and macro-economic factors too, yet AI is playing its part. Now AI (itself) is not doing this directly, it is in how we as humans at organisations are choosing to use AI that is influencing all this.
What we are seeing across the workforce now are:
Entry-level roles shrinking because AI handles the tasks they were built around
Middle management is being cut because AI handles the coordination those roles provided
The traditional career ladder of entry job → junior manager → senior manager → leadership is disappearing at both ends simultaneously
Young people are entering a labour market where the established route from education to economic participation no longer exists in the same form
Look, I don’t have answers to any of this.
I’m doing the ‘captain obvious’ move of pointing out the fire and not offering much in the way of solutions.
The obvious solution is to not discard the youth of today because all of the events I mentioned earlier, will happen. Plus, more importantly, we’re creating a lost generation of souls with little purpose, life skills and experience to live their own lives and reach their full potential, and ambitions.
So, what do we need to do?
Be more human. Yes, it sounds simple but not easy in these times.
We have to invest in the next-generation workforce. While AI can do a lot of the low-level tasks, humans bring their own brand of uniqueness in judgement, context, and emotions. That is still needed in the workplace today.
And that’s where my fellow L&D friends can deliver impact.
Final Thoughts
Ok, folks.
The informal development architecture that organisations never explicitly funded: learning by doing, shadowing managers, growing through feedback loops, is being quickly removed.
Now, more than ever, we must find ways to build capability in the next generation of workers.
What do you think? Share that with me by hitting “reply” to this message.
→ If you’ve found this helpful, please consider sharing it wherever you hang out online, tag me in and share your thoughts.

👀 ICYMI (In case you missed it!)
Want to learn how to build AI enablement in your org? I’ve launched an updated set of services designed specifically for L&D and People teams on AI enablement. Instead of me doing it for you, I show you and your teams how to build your own enablement strategies and much more.
13 lessons on building organisational fluency at scale. Hear from real practitioners at Stripe and Canva on how they’re making AI a part of the organisational culture.
Get my zero-cost human operating system for working with AI. A small anthology of my best, favourite and perhaps controversial pieces that serve as a guide to thriving, surviving and staying human in the age of AI. This isn’t a book but a small anthology of my published writing that I’ll keep adding to, so don’t forget to bookmark it.
VIDEO THOUGHTS 💾
How (and why) You Should Use AI to Teach AI
A great way to learn an AI tool is to actually use the AI tool. Wild concept, I know.
Yet most AI "training" still defaults to throwing slides at us and hoping it sticks. So, I'm happy to see Anthropic building their products into learning experiences for customers.
Is it flawless? Nope.
But this is how we scale into that maybe, could be, one day future of a course less experience. Your LMS is not going to disappear tomorrow, find the happy balance and build from this.
Enjoy 😊.
Till next time, you stay classy, learning friend!
How would you rate today's edition?
PS… If you’re enjoying the newsletter, will you take 4 seconds to forward this edition to a friend? It goes a long way in helping me grow the newsletter (and cut through our industry BS with actionable insights).
And one more thing, I’d love your input on how to make the newsletter even more useful for you!
So please leave a comment with:
Ideas you’d like covered in future editions
Your biggest takeaway from this edition
I read & reply to every single one of them!
P.S. Wanna build your L&D advantage?
Here’s four ways I can help:
Build your confidence and skills with the only AI course designed for L&D pros.
Partner with me on AI Enablement for your L&D team. I’ve worked with 1,000’s of L&D pros’s to build AI Fluency that supports teams with the practical AI skills you need in your L&D role and to enable your organisation.
Get a backstage pass to exclusive industry insights, events and a secret monthly newsletter with a premium community membership.
Book a 1:1 consulting session with me for support with your product or L&D tech challenges




